Gladbach sack coach Eugen Polanski: three defeats, twelve goals conceded and a decision that was already on the table
**Câu trả lời cốt lõi:** Borussia Moenchengladbach sa thải huấn luyện viên Eugen Polanski vào ngày 13 tháng 9, sau khi đội thua cả ba trận đầu Bundesliga và đứng cuối bảng với ba bàn thắng, mười hai bàn thua. Cựu huấn luyện viên Mainz 05 Jan-Moritz Lichte dẫn dắt tạm quyền. **Dữ kiện chính:** - Gladbach thua RB Leipzig 0-3 ở trận mở màn mùa giải Bundesliga. - Đội thua ngược Elversberg 3-4, nhận ba bàn thua trong hiệp hai. - Thất bại 0-5 trước Freiburg ngày 12 tháng 9 khiến Gladbach đứng cuối bảng. - Eugen Polanski từng là cầu thủ trẻ và cầu thủ đội một Gladbach, tiếp quản từ tháng 9 năm 2025. - Jan-Moritz Lichte, cựu huấn luyện viên Mainz 05, được giao nhiệm vụ tạm quyền. **Nguồn:** Thông báo chính thức của Borussia Moenchengladbach, ngày 13 tháng 9 năm 2026; bản tin Berlin, ngày 13 tháng 9 năm 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn **Hỏi đáp liên quan:** Q: Gladbach sa thải Eugen Polanski khi nào? A: Ngày 13 tháng 9, một ngày sau trận thua 0-5 trước Freiburg. Q: Ai thay thế Eugen Polanski? A: Jan-Moritz Lichte, cựu huấn luyện viên Mainz 05, dẫn dắt tạm quyền. Q: Gladbach đang đứng ở vị trí nào? A: Cuối bảng xếp hạng Bundesliga sau ba vòng đấu, không giành được điểm nào.
Among the footage I rewatched no fewer than five times, there is a moment that never made the evening bulletin. In the 84th minute, when Freiburg scored their fifth goal against Borussia Moenchengladbach, the camera swung to the technical area. Eugen Polanski was not looking at the pitch. He stood with his back to the touchline, both hands buried deep in his coat pockets, his eyes fixed on the stand behind the goal. It was the posture of a man who had already read the ending and no longer wanted to argue with it for another second.
More than twenty hours later, on Sunday 13 September, Gladbach announced the end of Polanski's tenure. Three matches, three defeats, not a single point, three goals scored, twelve conceded. The club sits bottom of the Bundesliga table, and the announcement came just one day after a 0-5 collapse against Freiburg at their own ground.
In the dressing room, people leave behind boots, the smell of sweat and half-finished sentences. From the outside, people see only the scoreline and draw conclusions. A decision like this is rarely born in a single evening, and it is rarely explained by a scoreline either.
A season that broke before it could take shape
Polanski took charge of Gladbach in September 2026. He arrived as a club man: a former academy player and then a senior player at this very club for many years. Appointments like that always cut both ways. The board believed that someone who understood the internal culture would shorten the adaptation period, would speak the language of the dressing room, would not need three months to understand why the North Stand sings that song in the twelfth minute. But when results do not come, that same familiarity becomes a barrier: it is very hard for a club to part ways with a man to whom it had just given a brief vote of confidence.
The first three matchdays of the new season tell a fairly clear story. In the opener, Gladbach lost 0-3 to RB Leipzig. A week later they went down 3-4 to Elversberg, a newly promoted side, after conceding three goals in the second half. On matchday three, Freiburg tore everything apart with a 0-5 scoreline.
Reading those three scorelines side by side, I see a straight line rather than three separate accidents. Twelve goals conceded in three matches, seven of them after the interval. The team ships an average of four goals a game and scores one. For a club with a tradition of block defending, built on discipline and compact distances, that is a structural catastrophe rather than a psychological one.
Rouven Schroeder, Gladbach's Head of Sports, said in the statement: "Despite a good pre-season and some encouraging signs, the team haven't been able to get the results we were looking for in the Bundesliga. Our recent performances ultimately led us to the conclusion that a change was needed, and we have therefore relieved Eugen of his duties with immediate effect."

Former Mainz 05 coach Jan-Moritz Lichte has been placed in interim charge.
What actually broke after the interval
Based on my experience following matches, there is a type of defeat that a scoreline never fully captures. It is the kind where a team is still in the right place in the first half, still holding its distances, still competing in midfield, and then from the 55th minute begins to lose the pitch one metre at a time. Not all at once. It slips the way a rope slips: each opposition counterattack stretches five metres longer, each lost ball in the third line costs two extra seconds to reorganise.
The three second-half goals against Elversberg are the clearest sign. A newly promoted side cannot score three goals in forty-five minutes in the Bundesliga through luck. To do that, they had to find a gap that repeated itself. That gap usually sits between the two centre-backs and the full-back, where a Gladbach central midfielder had just pushed forward to join the attack. When the ball is lost, the distance between the nearest man to the ball and the nearest centre-back stretches, and the opposition needs only one line-breaking pass to stand in front of the back line with a three-on-two.
The Freiburg match showed the consequence of that structure collapsing entirely. A team that concedes five at home usually loses on three things: set pieces, second balls, and counters. All three stem from the same dead point — the ability to recover the ball after losing it. Gladbach lost the ball in the opposition half and did not win it back within five seconds. When that repeats often enough, the back line stops defending according to plan and starts defending on instinct. The instinct of a group losing belief is to drop deep. Dropping deep means ceding midfield. Ceding midfield means the opposition shoot comfortably from the edge of the box.
There is another detail I noticed while rewatching the footage: the rhythm of substitutions. In all three matches, Gladbach's personnel changes came after the game had already tilted decisively. At this level, a coach can lose because of tactics, but he usually loses his job because he cannot correct the game while it is happening. A team that only reacts after conceding is a team that had already lost control of the match beforehand.
There is one more lesson from my years following bottom-of-the-table sides: when a defence concedes twelve goals in three matches, the cause is usually not the defence. It sits in the distance between the midfield line and the back four — the thing nobody sees in individual statistics. The centre-back is criticised for the final action, but the man who opened the gap was the one who pushed thirty metres forward earlier. Football always punishes invisible mistakes with very visible goals.
It is worth remembering that Gladbach is not a small club. This is a place that won the national title several times in the 1970s, a former power of German football before settling into the familiar middle of the table. The name "The Foals" still carries a memory of pride, and every time the club touches bottom, the weight of that memory grows larger than the reality on the pitch. Borussia-Park holds nearly fifty-four thousand people, and a near-full stand on a day the club sits last is pressure that no metric can measure.
The trap called "a good pre-season"
There is a detail in Schroeder's sentence worth pausing on, even though it is placed in the first clause as a consolation. He mentions a good pre-season and some encouraging signs. To me, that is the most honest part of the whole statement, and also the most worrying.
Pre-season football is a controlled laboratory. The intensity of duels is lower, opponents do not necessarily field their strongest eleven, and most importantly there are no points. A team can look very tidy across seven friendlies and then shatter on matchday three of the league, because those two environments do not measure the same thing. Friendlies measure an idea. The league measures whether that idea can survive under pressure.
When a club uses pre-season results to explain a competitive failure, that club is confessing that its internal metrics system cannot distinguish between the two kinds of data. And when the system cannot distinguish, decisions will always arrive late. A coach sacked after three matchdays is a coach who was judged on the wrong signals for at least two months beforehand.
The counter-intuitive read: 0-5 was not the cause
The easiest story to tell, and the easiest to accept, is this: Gladbach lost 0-5 to Freiburg, so Gladbach sacked the coach. A tidy line of cause and effect, easy to follow, perfect for a short bulletin and a headline.
But if the Gladbach board had truly acted because of one 0-5 defeat, they acted a week late. The turning point was the 3-4 loss to Elversberg, at home, against a newly promoted side, with three goals conceded in the second half. That was the moment every internal forecasting model had to flash red. The Freiburg match was only the sound of the door closing, not a knock on it.

Read that way, Sunday's announcement says more about the future than the past. The appointment of Jan-Moritz Lichte, a coach who built his reputation at Mainz 05 on structure, analysis and organisation, is a signal about the kind of football the club wants to see in the coming weeks. Not inspiration. Order. The early weeks of a Bundesliga season always come with their own market for firefighter coaches, and Gladbach has just entered that market.

There is one more layer that is rarely mentioned. Sacking a coach is the cheapest way for a club to prove it has acted. It changes the face in the technical area, changes the headlines, changes the mood in the press room. It does not change the quality of the squad, does not change the transfer policy, does not change the fact that Gladbach let key players leave without adequate replacements. Three matches and twelve goals conceded is the number of a team, not of one man.
I once waited two hours and forty-seven minutes in a stadium corridor to hear a player who had just scored say a single sentence: "I am afraid to tell the truth because nobody will believe me." That sentence explained no particular defeat, but it explained a great deal about how a group falls silent when everything is collapsing. Around Gladbach right now, I do not hear anyone saying anything loudly. I only see a club choosing to repair the part that is easiest to repair.
A good reporter is not the one who arrives first, but the one who stays last
In this profession I have learned that the real signals rarely sit in official statements. A statement is written after everything is finished, polished with administrative language and sent out at a convenient hour. The signals sit in what happens next: who stands beside whom in the first training session, whether the back line holds high or low in the opening twenty minutes, and how the stands react to the captain's first touch.
For Gladbach, the three markers worth watching all fall within the next month. The first is Lichte's debut: the distance between midfield and defence will reveal whether the problem was diagnosed as fitness, organisation or belief. The second is how the team responds after conceding the first goal; if the back line still holds its intended height, that is a sign the new structure has taken root. The third is the winter transfer window, where the club will have to answer the question it avoided all summer.
Waiting is not doing nothing. Waiting is listening to the grass whisper. And at Borussia-Park right now, the grass has just whispered the easiest thing to hear: one coach has left, but eleven men still have to walk out next weekend, in the early autumn cold, in front of a stand that has run out of patience.
